TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Drake Maye | #10 |
![]() Joshua Dobbs | #11 |
![]() Ben Wooldridge |
![]() Rhamondre Stevenson | #38 |
![]() Antonio Gibson | #4 |
![]() Terrell Jennings | #26 |
![]() TreVeyon Henderson | #32 |
![]() Lan Larison |
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Buffalo Bills | 13 | 4 | 0 | 0.765 |
2 | ![]() Miami Dolphins | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
3 | ![]() New York Jets | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0.294 |
4 | ![]() New England Patriots | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
It was a sizable investment when the Patriots signed Gibson to a three-year, $11.25 million contract, and he played well when called upon in 2024. Gibson probably won't ever fulfill his power potential at an otherwise burly build of nearly 230 pounds, but his sub-4.4 speed pairs with plus pass-catching ability to pose an unusual overall threat from scrimmage. The selection of second-round pick TreVeyon Henderson is still a mammoth road block, even if someone acknowledges Gibson as a capable running back. Henderson was the 38th overall pick out of Ohio State because he's expected to become one of the best running backs in the NFL within the next two years, whereas Gibson might merely be useful in general. Rhamondre Stevenson is the likely starter and Henderson will likely claim most of what's left, so Gibson's best fit might be on another team. In general, though, Gibson has produced in the NFL when given snaps, so if he plays more than expected in New England he could do something worthwhile with the opportunity.
Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
18 | @ | ![]() BUF | W23-16 | 12 | 41 | 0 | 3.4 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 20 | 5.0 | 0 | 12 |
17 | @ | ![]() LAC | L7-40 | 12 | 63 | 0 | 5.3 | 20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
16 | vs | ![]() BUF | L21-24 | 10 | 28 | 0 | 2.8 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
15 | vs | ![]() ARI | L17-30 | 7 | 33 | 0 | 4.7 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 0 | 20 |
13 | @ | ![]() IND | L24-25 | 7 | 62 | 1 | 8.9 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
12 | vs | ![]() MIA | L15-34 | 6 | 31 | 0 | 5.2 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 |
11 | @ | ![]() LAR | L22-28 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 4.5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
10 | vs | ![]() CHI | W19-3 | 5 | 26 | 0 | 5.2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
9 | vs | ![]() TEN | L17-20 | 1 | -1 | 0 | -1.0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
8 | @ | ![]() NYJ | W25-22 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 1.4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
7 | vs | ![]() JAX | L16-32 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1.3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
6 | @ | ![]() HOU | L21-41 | 13 | 19 | 0 | 1.5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 | 12 |
5 | @ | ![]() MIA | L10-15 | 6 | 52 | 0 | 8.7 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
4 | vs | ![]() SF | L13-30 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 2.0 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 67 | 22.3 | 0 | 50 |
3 | vs | ![]() NYJ | L3-24 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 5.8 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 7 |
2 | @ | ![]() SEA | L20-23 | 11 | 96 | 0 | 8.7 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
1 | vs | ![]() CIN | W16-10 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 2.6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |