![]() Justin Herbert | #10 |
![]() Taylor Heinicke | #4 |
![]() Trey Lance | #5 |
![]() DJ Uiagalelei | #13 |
![]() Omarion Hampton | #8 |
![]() Najee Harris | #22 |
![]() Kimani Vidal | #30 |
![]() Hassan Haskins | #28 |
![]() Raheim Sanders | #35 |
![]() Jaret Patterson | #34 |
![]() Ladd McConkey | #15 |
![]() Dez Fitzpatrick | #87 |
![]() Brenden Rice | #82 |
![]() Dalevon Campbell | #38 |
![]() Jaylen Johnson | #39 |
![]() Luke Grimm | #37 |
![]() Tre Harris | #9 |
![]() Derius Davis | #12 |
![]() Jalen Reagor | #88 |
![]() Quentin Johnston | #1 |
![]() Mike Williams | #81 |
![]() KeAndre Lambert-Smith | #84 |
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Kansas City Chiefs | 15 | 2 | 0 | 0.882 |
2 | ![]() Los Angeles Chargers | 11 | 6 | 0 | 0.647 |
3 | ![]() Denver Broncos | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
4 | ![]() Las Vegas Raiders | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
Harris' career in Pittsburgh didn't turn out as envisioned when they selected him in the first round out of Alabama in 2021, because the big-play ability he showed in college never materialized in the NFL. Harris is a smart player who likely will win approval in any locker room, including his new one with the Chargers, but he can't offer much more than volume as a ballcarrier, more or less taking what the defense gives him. Despite his big build, Harris doesn't actually run with much power - he can set anchor and hold ground, but running over or around defenders is a rather rare occurrence. Signed to a one-year, fully guaranteed $5.25 million contract, Harris' ability to eat innings has an obvious enough use for a Chargers offense that endeavors to be among the most run-heavy in the league. The selection of first-round pick Omarion Hampton might have preempted Harris' main appeal for fantasy, however. The 221-pound rookie is built for big-time volume in his own right, and unlike with Harris, there's a big-play threat when Hampton and his 4.46 speed are on the field. We might see Hampton's usage trend toward high-leverage situations while Harris' usage trends toward low-leverage ones.
Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
1 | vs | ![]() BAL | L14-28 | 6 | 17 | 0 | 2.8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 0 | 21 |
Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
18 | @ | ![]() CIN | L17-19 | 12 | 36 | 1 | 3.0 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 20 | 5.0 | 0 | 12 |
17 | @ | ![]() KC | L10-29 | 13 | 74 | 0 | 5.7 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3.5 | 0 | 5 |
16 | vs | ![]() BAL | L17-34 | 9 | 42 | 0 | 4.7 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | vs | ![]() PHI | L13-27 | 6 | 14 | 0 | 2.3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
14 | @ | ![]() CLE | W27-14 | 16 | 53 | 1 | 3.3 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
13 | vs | ![]() CIN | W44-38 | 16 | 75 | 1 | 4.7 | 20 | 6 | 6 | 54 | 9.0 | 0 | 25 |
12 | vs | ![]() CLE | L19-24 | 16 | 41 | 0 | 2.6 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 | 10 |
11 | @ | ![]() BAL | W18-16 | 18 | 63 | 0 | 3.5 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 30 | 7.5 | 0 | 20 |
10 | vs | ![]() WAS | W28-27 | 21 | 53 | 1 | 2.5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
8 | @ | ![]() NYG | W26-18 | 19 | 114 | 0 | 6.0 | 26 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 5.7 | 0 | 13 |
7 | @ | ![]() NYJ | W37-15 | 21 | 102 | 1 | 4.9 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
6 | vs | ![]() LV | W32-13 | 14 | 106 | 1 | 7.6 | 36 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 11 |
5 | @ | ![]() DAL | L17-20 | 14 | 42 | 0 | 3.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 0 | 20 |
4 | vs | ![]() IND | L24-27 | 13 | 19 | 0 | 1.5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 54 | 18.0 | 0 | 32 |
3 | @ | ![]() LAC | W20-10 | 18 | 70 | 0 | 3.9 | 21 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 3.2 | 0 | 8 |
2 | vs | ![]() DEN | W13-6 | 17 | 69 | 0 | 4.1 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 | 5 |
1 | vs | ![]() ATL | W18-10 | 20 | 70 | 0 | 3.5 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |