TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() HoustonTexans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
2 | ![]() IndianapolisColts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
3 | ![]() JacksonvilleJaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
4 | ![]() TennesseeTitans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
Between his high-ankle sprains and the sprawling dysfunction of the Colts offense the last two years, it's been a while since Taylor demonstrated what he's truly capable of. Unfortunately for him, Taylor isn't eligible for the change-of-scenery glow-up that Christian McCaffrey, Saquon Barkley and Derrick Henry all benefited from in recent years. Whatever Taylor accomplishes will likely need to be done in spite of the Colts offense. The high-ankle injuries from both of the last two years are a legitimate and mounting concern, moreover, and it makes sense that Taylor might be subjected to more leg stress given how he forces defenders to pile onto him to bring him down. Meanwhile, it'll be easy for defenses to key on Taylor if the Colts continue to get sub-NFL play from Anthony Richardson and/or Daniel Jones at quarterback. The good news is that Taylor really is a compelling threat from scrimmage, similar to guys like McCaffrey, Barkley and Henry, so if the Colts turn out better than expected so should Taylor's fantasy fortunes. It's just difficult to give Indianapolis much benefit of the doubt on that front, especially when defenses know their weekly mission is to sell out to stop Taylor.
Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
18 | @ | ![]() JAX | W26-23 | 34 | 177 | 1 | 5.2 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
17 | vs | ![]() NYG | L33-45 | 32 | 125 | 2 | 3.9 | 26 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 | 7 |
16 | @ | ![]() TEN | W38-30 | 29 | 218 | 3 | 7.5 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
15 | vs | ![]() DEN | L13-31 | 22 | 107 | 0 | 4.9 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
13 | vs | ![]() NE | W25-24 | 25 | 96 | 0 | 3.8 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 1 | 7 |
12 | @ | ![]() DET | L6-24 | 11 | 35 | 0 | 3.2 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
11 | vs | ![]() NYJ | W28-27 | 24 | 57 | 0 | 2.4 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
10 | @ | ![]() BUF | L20-30 | 21 | 114 | 0 | 5.4 | 58 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 6 |
9 | vs | ![]() MIN | L13-21 | 13 | 48 | 0 | 3.7 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 3.7 | 0 | 11 |
8 | vs | ![]() HOU | L20-23 | 20 | 105 | 1 | 5.3 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 12.0 | 0 | 12 |
4 | @ | ![]() PIT | W27-24 | 21 | 88 | 1 | 4.2 | 21 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 6.7 | 0 | 10 |
3 | @ | ![]() CHI | W21-16 | 23 | 110 | 2 | 4.8 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 25.0 | 0 | 25 |
2 | vs | ![]() GB | L10-16 | 12 | 103 | 0 | 8.6 | 29 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 16.0 | 0 | 18 |
1 | @ | ![]() HOU | L27-29 | 16 | 48 | 1 | 3.0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |