AFC South Division Standings
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Houston Texans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
| 2 |  Indianapolis Colts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
| 3 |  Jacksonville Jaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
| 4 |  Tennessee Titans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Texans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
| 2 | Indianapolis Colts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
| 3 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
| 4 | Tennessee Titans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
Walker will forever be compared to Aidan Hutchinson thanks to their relative draft positions in 2022, and that is very unlikely to be a positive thing for him. However, Walker has shown progress every season as a pro. His improvement in 2024 came primarily as a run defender and resulted in him logging a career-best 60 tackles and 13 tackles for loss. Combined with back-to-back double-digit sack seasons, Walker is slowly emerging as a well-rounded contributor for both the Jaguars and fantasy managers. Even if he plateaus a bit in 2025, Walker has established himself as a strong fantasy producer along the defensive line. He should also maintain a key role this season after having his fifth-year option picked up, a clear signal that the new coaching staff and management regime in Jacksonville are still prioritizing Walker's role with the team.
 Trevor Lawrence | #16 |
 Nick Mullens | #14 |
 John Wolford | #18 |
 Seth Henigan | #19 |
 Travis Etienne | #1 |
 Tank Bigsby | #4 |
 Bhayshul Tuten | #33 |
 LeQuint Allen | #36 |
 Ja'Quinden Jackson | #38 |
| IDP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Opp | Result | TKL | SACK | FF | FR | TD | |
| 18 | vs |  IND | L23-26 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | @ |  TEN | W20-13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | vs |  LV | L14-19 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | @ |  NYJ | L25-32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | vs | TEN | W10-6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | @ |  HOU | L20-23 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | vs |  DET | L6-52 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | @ |  MIN | L7-12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | vs |  PHI | L23-28 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | @ |  GB | L27-30 | 4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | @ |  NE | W32-16 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | vs |  CHI | L16-35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ | IND | W37-34 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | vs | HOU | L20-24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs |  BUF | L10-47 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | @ |  CLE | L13-18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | vs |  MIA | L17-20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
