TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Trevor Lawrence | #16 |
 Nick Mullens | #12 |
 John Wolford | #18 |
 Seth Henigan | #19 |
 Travis Etienne | #1 |
 Tank Bigsby | #4 |
 Bhayshul Tuten | #33 |
 LeQuint Allen | #36 |
 Keilan Robinson | #31 |
 Ja'Quinden Jackson | #38 |
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Houston Texans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
| 2 |  Indianapolis Colts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
| 3 |  Jacksonville Jaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
| 4 |  Tennessee Titans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
Bigsby bounced back from his nightmarish 2023 rookie season with a competent showing in 2024, and, in doing so, established himself as a starting candidate for the Jaguars in 2025. That said, Bigsby's fantasy upside is limited by the likelihood he remains a no-go for passing downs. His 477 NFL snaps have yielded just eight receptions for 60 yards on 16 targets, and even as a pure runner, Bigsby is probably no better than average by starting-RB standards. He averaged 4.6 yards per carry last year, but his rushing production was heavily front-weighted -- 5.8 YPC in Weeks 1-8 (493 yards, four TDs) and 3.3 YPC from Week 9 on (273 yards, three TDs). Bigsby offers a power element that Travis Etienne cannot, but Etienne is better at everything else, and now they'll both have to hold off rookie fourth-round pick Bhayshul Tuten, who ran a 4.32 40 at 206 pounds.
| Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
| 18 | vs |  IND | L23-26 | 14 | 39 | 1 | 2.8 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| 17 | @ |  TEN | W20-13 | 11 | 33 | 0 | 3.0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | vs |  LV | L14-19 | 12 | 50 | 1 | 4.2 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | @ |  NYJ | L25-32 | 11 | 42 | 0 | 3.8 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | vs | TEN | W10-6 | 18 | 55 | 1 | 3.1 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 13 | @ |  HOU | L20-23 | 7 | 28 | 0 | 4.0 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| 10 | @ |  MIN | L7-12 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | vs |  PHI | L23-28 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 2.8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | @ |  GB | L27-30 | 18 | 78 | 0 | 4.3 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 | 6 |
| 7 | @ |  NE | W32-16 | 26 | 118 | 2 | 4.5 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | vs |  CHI | L16-35 | 7 | 24 | 0 | 3.4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ | IND | W37-34 | 13 | 101 | 2 | 7.8 | 65 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 28.0 | 0 | 28 |
| 4 | vs | HOU | L20-24 | 7 | 90 | 0 | 12.9 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs |  BUF | L10-47 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 4.5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | @ |  CLE | L13-18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | vs |  MIA | L17-20 | 12 | 73 | 0 | 6.1 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
