TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | ![]() Los AngelesRams | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
T1 | ![]() SeattleSeahawks | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
3 | ![]() ArizonaCardinals | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
4 | ![]() San Francisco49ers | 6 | 11 | 0 | 0.353 |
He technically missed Week 18 with a knee injury, but otherwise Conner's 2024 season was probably the healthiest of his eight-year career. Unfortunately, this is more likely a flag for future regression than it is the sign of a new day, because Conner's ruthlessly physical running style places a high physical toll on both the tacklers and himself. This can make Conner slightly challenging as a fantasy asset, because his flickering availability can undermine his otherwise superb per-snap production. A player like that is at risk to end up on your bench during his productive games, and in your lineup in the ones he leaves early. Still, all indications are that Arizona views Conner as their workhorse running back despite the 2024 third-round selection of Trey Benson, so if Conner stays relatively healthy again then he has a good shot to remain the clear workhorse another year. Benson's speed could prove increasingly tempting to Arizona coaches if his fundamentals improve from last year, however, and with Conner turning 30 in May it wouldn't be shocking if significant athletic decline set in with no notice. Until then, though, Conner should offer standout per-play production both as a runner and receiver.
Rushing | Receiving | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week | Opp | Result | CAR | YDS | TD | AVG | LNG | REC | TGT | YDS | AVG | TD | LNG | |
18 | @ | ![]() SF | W47-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 |
17 | vs | ![]() LAR | L9-13 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
16 | vs | ![]() CAR | L30-36 | 15 | 117 | 1 | 7.8 | 40 | 4 | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 0 | 36 |
15 | @ | ![]() NE | W30-17 | 16 | 110 | 2 | 6.9 | 53 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 0 | 12 |
14 | @ | ![]() SEA | L18-30 | 18 | 90 | 0 | 5.0 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 8.0 | 1 | 11 |
13 | vs | ![]() MIN | L22-23 | 17 | 68 | 0 | 4.0 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 4.3 | 0 | 7 |
12 | vs | ![]() SEA | L6-16 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 1.1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 0 | 11 |
10 | @ | ![]() NYJ | W31-6 | 12 | 33 | 1 | 2.8 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 80 | 16.0 | 0 | 44 |
9 | @ | ![]() CHI | W29-9 | 18 | 107 | 0 | 5.9 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 4.0 | 0 | 8 |
8 | vs | ![]() MIA | W28-27 | 20 | 53 | 1 | 2.6 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 8.0 | 0 | 9 |
7 | @ | ![]() LAC | W17-15 | 19 | 101 | 0 | 5.3 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 51 | 25.5 | 0 | 33 |
6 | vs | ![]() GB | L13-34 | 7 | 24 | 0 | 3.4 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 22 | 5.5 | 0 | 9 |
5 | vs | ![]() SF | W24-23 | 19 | 86 | 0 | 4.5 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 7.0 | 0 | 15 |
4 | @ | ![]() WAS | L14-42 | 18 | 104 | 1 | 5.8 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9.0 | 0 | 9 |
3 | @ | ![]() DET | L13-20 | 9 | 17 | 0 | 1.9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 8 |
2 | @ | ![]() LAR | W41-10 | 21 | 122 | 1 | 5.8 | 22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 |
1 | vs | ![]() BUF | L28-34 | 16 | 50 | 1 | 3.1 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 33 | 11.0 | 0 | 22 |