AFC South Division Standings
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Houston Texans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
| 2 |  Indianapolis Colts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
| 3 |  Jacksonville Jaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
| 4 |  Tennessee Titans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Houston Texans | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0.588 |
| 2 | Indianapolis Colts | 8 | 9 | 0 | 0.471 |
| 3 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 4 | 13 | 0 | 0.235 |
| 4 | Tennessee Titans | 3 | 14 | 0 | 0.176 |
 Trevor Lawrence | #16 |
 Nick Mullens | #12 |
 John Wolford | #18 |
 Seth Henigan |
 Travis Etienne | #1 |
 Tank Bigsby | #4 |
 Keilan Robinson | #31 |
 Bhayshul Tuten | #33 |
 Ja'Quinden Jackson | |
 LeQuint Allen | #36 |
Oluokun has established himself as one of the most consistent tacklers in the league and thus one of the safest IDP selections. He's finished with no fewer than 170 tackles in each of the last three years (two of which have come with the Jaguars) and he's topped 1,050 snaps in all three campaigns. He signed a four-year extension this offseason, which includes $22.5 million in guarantees. While there would have been little doubt about his role entering 2024, the monetary commitment will keep him locked in as every snap player. While Oluokun's calling card is his ability to rack up tackles, he has found a way to contribute more explosive plays as well, combining to rack up 4.5 sacks, one interception, three forced fumbles and four fumbles recovered in two seasons with the Jaguars.
| IDP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week | Opp | Result | TKL | SACK | FF | FR | TD | |
| 18 | vs |  IND | L23-26 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | @ |  TEN | W20-13 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | vs |  LV | L14-19 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | @ |  NYJ | L25-32 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | vs | TEN | W10-6 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | @ |  HOU | L20-23 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | vs |  DET | L6-52 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | @ |  MIN | L7-12 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | vs |  PHI | L23-28 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | @ |  GB | L27-30 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | @ |  NE | W32-16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | vs |  CHI | L16-35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | @ | IND | W37-34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | vs | HOU | L20-24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | vs |  BUF | L10-47 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | @ |  CLE | L13-18 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | vs |  MIA | L17-20 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
