“Kelce expects to be 100 percent by camp https://t.co/5cETscYUX8”

Hurt his back carrying the team

@chrislieffers Tough call, in terms of straight up who is better, it’s Adams, but Kelce gives you WR1 value in the TE slot which is rare and valuable. Comes down to this: which do you think is more valuable, the advantage you get playing Kelce over another TE (Kelce vs. your TE1, like OJ Howard or something) OR the advantage you get playing Adams over another WR (Adams vs. your WR1, like Odell or Keenan Allen or something). Very tough call. IMO you take the positional advantage at TE cause Kelce’s value is lower, but much more scarce at that position

Why not 110%? Disappointed :/

@boneslab shared something.

He instantly creates a weekly advantage at TE for you....Adams is the man, but you can find a solid WR (maybe Mike Evans or someone like him) while retaining Kelce.

Now all we need is Jason to play center

Great question, Chris...I think I'm keeping Kelce.

That is what I was originally thinking. With how limited the TE position is I thought keeping kelce would instantly put me at an advantage. But Adams 15 targets a game also makes him so valuable .

Sorry @soxandgators he’s ours

And 50% after Week 1

Is taking Kelce in the late first round a good idea this year? I want as much of that KC offense as I can get and I don’t want others snagging him.

2nd Round