If London and G-Wilson were both to have top 10 seasons, which one would u rather have going forward?

bro kirk is 36 lol

no ones opinion will ever be moved

London for me.

thielen was elite and addison was great before kirk got hurt

To think teams can, especially one as incompetent as NYJ, can bring in a top QB to lead their franchise out of thin air is funny

But if we were to bet who plays longer, I'm going Kirk

The context of the question is important. Who am I going to value higher with similar production? Obviously the one tied to the younger QB in a more stable regime

One is 4 years younger with a offensive scheme from the McVay tree. Could be a whole new regime in NY. It's a no brainer to me.

London. Younger QB is the tie breaker

London all day because of QB situation. People say Wilson has been better but they’ve both done virtually the same thing. London had more target competition and played in a run first offense. I’ll never understand people putting them in separate tiers

wilson and it’s not close

london

londond and Kirk gonna be insane

i don’t care that rodgers is older kirk is coming off a torn acl and he’s not young atlanta has a more competitive division in a way because new england is going to be a bottom five type team so the defenses are going to play harder and wilson has shown that with the dog crap play of zack wilson mike white and trevor simian he can get it done unlike london who was unable to play better than his qb play with subjectively better qb play in hinicky and ridder

Both studs

Gee whizzy for me

I’ve always liked him better