If London and G-Wilson were both to have top 10 seasons, which one would u rather have going forward?

Just one was a couple months earlier

yea but ur discrediting rodgers but not kirk even when both off an imnjury and both old as dirt

One is 4 years younger with a offensive scheme from the McVay tree. Could be a whole new regime in NY. It's a no brainer to me.

London’s QB doesn’t do anything for me - Wilson is the better WR

kirk and arod both have 1-2 years left

ur acting like kirk will also go to 41 lol

Especially with the trajectory of QBs coming in the next couple years and NIL having guys stay an extra yr or two

theyll retire at the same time the difference is gwil has more talent and less competition

The question isn't who is the better of the two. Value and ability are different to me

When Rodgers is off the books the Jets will have a bag of $ - we know they aren’t all going to hit the market but just look at the list of FA QBs in 25 -

just because rodgers will go to 41 doeasnt mean kirk will

theyll both be done in 2 years max

But if we were to bet who plays longer, I'm going Kirk

kirk might get an extra year of mid over arod but thats not helping londons value

Your argument is assuming that the jets won’t have a qb of Kirk’s caliber when Rodgers retires

kirk will be a below average qb if he plays after rodgers retires

They are gonna be competitive and have to re up on Wilson, Hall, and Sauce. Don't think they are gonna be in market to offer top of market money to a top QB

doesnt have to be a top qb lol

most starting qbs will be better tghan kirk

you know nfl players regress correct?

especially ones that are pushing 40

This isn’t about the qb - if you want to say a WR had an edge because they are tied to a Mahomes, etc I get it - but to base your a regiment of a few years of Kirk is silly

What if ATL brings in Penix or another younger qb to sit behind Cousins this year? Seen a few mocks where this happens