Would you guys trade Saquon to receive Jamhyr Gibbs straight up in dynasty or would the Saquon side need to offer more?

If I’m the Gibbs owner I would need more on top of Saquon. Not much more, but I would squeeze everything I could

aweldon 4 months ago

i mean if you can do it straight up sure but more likely Saquon side has to add. I cannot see a scenario where Gibbs manager gives up without getting more

The_Old_Geezer 4 months ago

Saquon side needs to add more due to age difference

Stxmatt 4 months ago

I would not be looking to tier down from Gibbs to a much older Saquon coming off a career season. I can't see that there is something that is both worthwhile to the Gibbs owner, and palatable to the Saquon owner. But sure, give it a go.

A440 4 months ago

I’d definitely do it if they’ll take it. I doubt they will though. Would likely need to add

LeejayRichards 4 months ago

I’m probably in the minority that leans saquon straight up. So if I can get saquon+ for Gibbs I’d make that trade

HawgJohnson 4 months ago

This is hard because Saquon is the only RB. Gibbs will be in a timeshare. I tend to think straight up is fine but giving up more than Saquon is just not smart

DoobiesDawgPound93 4 months ago

I’d need like pick 1.06-1.07 on top of Saquon to get rid of Gibbs

ShadowsKeeper 4 months ago

Must add more on top of Saquon to reach a Gibbs acquisition

EskimoTribe 4 months ago

yeah Gibbs all day

TRubb1e 4 months ago

The only way I'm giving up Gibbs to get Saquon is if I'm completely rebuilding and could get a solid asset on top and then flip Saquon to a contender.

jsolo1 4 months ago

Win now Saquon, rebuild Gibbs

WaiverWarrior97 4 months ago

Well guys I traded Saquon away for Gibbs straight up! For context, I came in second place last season and the Gibbs owner came in first, so I just traded Saquon to the defending champion for Gibbs