Rachaad white or Isiah Pacheco?

Added WR competition isn’t added RB competition lmao

You think Worthy is gonna take snaps away from Pacheco? Lol

The only reason white was great for fantasy was because he was the unquestioned workhorse. And now they go get a solid pass catching rb to bring in to take some work off of him, where they do the opposite in KC and are looking like they’ll use Pacheco even more

@jimmikmik if you had White and were going to pursue Pacheco how much would you add to White to get Pacheco? What’s the value difference?

And actually, in the 4 games McKinnon missed, Pacheco averaged 4.75 receptions per game. That’s an 81 reception pace for the full season which greatly outpaced White

@OldeManStrength

So I mean if we want to talk about receiving work, based on that small sample Pacheco has the clear higher ceiling

And again, White has added backfield competition and will likely lose some snaps and work

@jimmikmik what’s the value difference? For the OP I think he wants to know. I said it’s pretty close. You said Pacheco easily. How much does Easily cost?

Depends on the league lmao

Considering there are people out there who prefer white, seems like you could flip him one for one to the right owner

So fairly close. And thanks for the spirited conversation. @jimmikmik

Pacheco. White is a volume back and they drafted a rb who might take passing downs away

@jimmikmik what would YOU give for Pacheco if you had white and wanted to move off?

You said one for one. That is close value by definition.

You didn’t read lol

Context matters

Then you were contrarian to your own answer and said not in my rankings.

That’s the context you provided

Did you just learn the word contrarian? lol

Like I said, league dependent

Giving up a ton would be a bad value play considering in some leagues you could get Pacheco plus for White

@JayDaDon24 Pacheco for me. Bucky will probably take some passing work from White, which will cut into his overall production