Chase was just put on the block in my 12 team SF start 11. I have Gibbs that I’d be willing to trade but only have the 2.10 and 2.11, a 25 2nd, a 2 2026 1sts. I do have ARSB. Would you try and get a package that includes Gibbs to get Chase, or try and send ARSB + to get Chase? ARSB and Chase are close so I don’t think I’d add much to get Chase.

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

@ChefHerbie @Bode960 @alfyflrs13 @I_Like_TDs

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

That seems cheap for a Burrow/Chase stack

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

Had I know thta was the price I would have been more aggressive

I_Like_TDs 22 days ago

Jesus that’s an absolute steal

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

So far one person has vetoed the trade (we put it to a vote in our league), but generally everyone just pushes traded through if it’s not obvious collusion

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

Crazy deal

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

Guy that gets Burrow and Chase had just barely traded TLaw for the 1.02. Good deals for him today

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

Now he has Burrow, Hurts, Jacobs, KW, Swift, Lamb, Chase, K Allen, Hock, Pitts

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

And D Smith

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

🤦‍♂️

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

3 vetoes now haha

I_Like_TDs 22 days ago

I don’t think veto’s should exist. Unless it’s collusion, managers should be free to do what they want. Doesn’t mean the trades isn’t lopsided. But it’s not outright collusion or anything

AmonAMission76 22 days ago

Agreed. I haven’t voted yet. But that is the rule we go with: no vetoes unless it’s collusion. We’ve never had this many vetoes before 🤔