How much do the SF rookie ADP rankings change after the first night of the draft? Penix top 10, Bowers later, etc?

But JJ obviously now lands in the best possible rookie QB position

its funny because the NFL is a copycat league. with the success of Campbell now teams want CEO type coaches. then you see Love sit 3 years in GB now ATL maybe thinks they can do the same especially given the core they have

Oh I know what they saw in Penix, I actually wanted him to go to Minny. Penix was my #2 QB in the draft. I just don’t understand why Atlanta took him. Of all the teams in the league, that team made the least sense

The Bowers pick was the one that through me for an even bigger loop. I know what they’re doing, I’m just not sure of the fantasy implications for both Bowers and Mayer. Could end up being that Bowers ends up being more of a blocking-type TE, cuz I’m not positive, but don’t think that’s a strength of Mayer. But I’m really just speculating

T5 should be unchanged. The overreaction to Bowers to LV has me hopeful he can be snagged later than before.

Wouldn't shocke me at all if they try to move him for a 2nd.

LAC did use the 5th most 12 personnel set though, so maybe. At least if Telesco is aligned with Pierce

Shrug, the numbers change. 10+ years ago, the dominant slot-receiver was barely a thing. 10 years before that, the RB was the base of most offenses

10 years before that, the QB was more of a leader than a producer

Shrug if teams were moving toward that we'd see the 12 set getting more usage than 3/32 teams running it 30%+

Well…yeah, not saying it’s going to take the league by storm starting this year. Just saying what I’ve heard. Again…it’s not something I’m guaranteeing, but it fits with the drafting of Bowers to a team that just spent high capital on the position

For years we've seen first round TEs now. Engram, Howard, Njoku, Fant, Hock, Pitts, etc.. Yet there's not a huge movement by anyone to move to those sets. Now we're drawing correlations because a prior FO drafted a guy in round 2, and the next year a TE viewed widely as generational falls so they take him?

Now, if Mayer gets dealt, then we have a difinitive answer to that

It doesn't really fit though, it's just trying to connect dots.

Its a different FO and Bowers was a very good value pick

Sounds good man. I’m sure you’re right

No need to get defensive.

I’m not. In fact, it’s not worth arguing about hypotheticals to me. Honestly don’t care if I’m right, that’s my point.

"I'm sure your right"

Now now fellas we got another night of drafting save your energy

It just cracks me up when objective data points are called "hypothetical". They're quite literally the opposite.

@A440 @ChefHerbie @CheeseburgerWalrus1 How would you all feel about having Bowers as your starting TE for this upcoming season?

Unless I’m rebuilding anyways…then I’m good with it