Zero WR vs Zero RB strategy which one will work better for this year in PPR? Looking to employ one Any help would be greatly appreciated!
I think it's good to think about these scenarios just in case. What if you end up with 2 WRs by the time the 3rd round hits. Are you ok w/ Fournette or Mack as your RB1?
That is what I mean. Know who might be available, can determine who your pick that round is.
leaning zero rb outside the Big 5
in redraft
remember how Chubb became a baller last year or Alvin Kamara the year before.
its much easier to find an RB1 mid season than to find a stud WR midseason
Exactly what I was thinking in terms of top 5 if I have top 5 I’m going back but after that I would love to go back to back wideout
its been working well for me in mocks
But like everyone else said it’s kinda a pick oriented thing I just like hearing opinion but I agree 100%
In my 12 team startup dynasty, I had the 1.7, 1.8, and 2.3 and had the mindset to go RB-RB-RB with my first three picks. When all the RBs went early, I ended up taking DHops, D. Adams, and JuJu with my three picks. Oh well, my strategy went out the window. Now will have a more difficult time picking RBs.
Who are your current backs? @sactoboy
@Saquonhypetrain we are currently at pick 3.2, my next pick is at 3.7, so no RBs for me yet. Not sure if I should take a RB with my next pick or take Kittle/Ertz if one falls to me. I wanted to take Mixon with my 1.7 but he was taken at 1.5 so I just zagged while everyone boarded RBs
I feel but that’s a great groups of wideouts
If you’re in a PPR you can always focus on pass catching backs as well@
True, I wanted other teams to fear my three RB monster lineup, but I don't think other teams would be as intimidated with three monster WRs. It was the oddest draft where only my two WRs were taken on 1st round. I guess in this league, folks love and value RBs more
None loser
Draft a balanced team
If you are picking at the bottom of the first round, zero RB is a good strategy. Especially in 10 team leagues. I see more quality casing RBs out of the top 10 than WRs. Imo and the 2 cents it's worth.
That’s what I was thinking mainly towards the back end of the first for zero Rb
I always talk about it but come draft time I go with what works best
Because sometimes guys can fall and you have to adjust on the fly
If I were picking in top of the round I would have to pick an RB1 first, then pick 2 WR
It starts to get tricky around the 5-6 pick
I’ve seen Gordon/Hopkins/Bell go there