Sleeper
Play Together
JOIN IN
FF Advice
GreggyBys  •  3 months ago
trade

10 team SF I was offered the 1.07 and 2.01 for Bryce Young. My other QBs are Lamar, JJ, and Darnold. Are you sticking with Bryce or taking the picks? Im looking to upgrade at WR this offseason

cvgibbs 3 months ago

Fair value but Bryce did look pretty good after being benched

A440 3 months ago

I’d also still disagree. A good QB is not a game changer. A great one is. He’s already got one of maybe 5 I’d consider difference makers. Past those, there are ones to avoid, but largely they produce the same.

GreggyBys 3 months ago

I also know these picks are going to increase in value as we get closer to the draft

A440 3 months ago

If people horde them and devote lots of resources to them, then demand goes up, which drives up price. It’s artificially inflated, but since even an average QB serves a real purpose in a flex spot, the demand can’t help but rise

1
GreggyBys 3 months ago

@A440 appreciate all your thoughts! Gives me another perspective to think about, and has me really considering taking this deal

A440 3 months ago

I will tell you in all honestly, in the SF leagues I’ve won where the QB value was overinflated, I won with 1 solid (but not top) QB. That’s the case in all but 1 of the leagues (where I happened to have more QBs)

A440 3 months ago

The reason being, the total resources of the league are a set value. Since all teams seek a complete and winning team, if the whole league is overspending on QBs, that means they aren’t spending it on other positions. This also means the other positions somewhat limited prices (usually because everyone wants more resources to grab QBs). Often means you can stack every other position pretty easily, and if you can do that, you lose little at the flex spot without a QB in it. The main reason why QBs in a flex are so strong is because they’re consistent and score highly, and typically in a flex spot, people are putting RB3/WR4/TE2 so the comparison gives significant advantage to the QB side. However, if you’re putting an RB/WR2 or a TE1 or better, it minimizes the advantage which highlights your advantage at every other position.

1
aweldon 3 months ago

smash that for sure

cwmoorez 3 months ago

great takes both ways, if I had to start one of JJ Darnold or Young I would hold Young, but it really would depend on how my league values picks and players because I would package the picks with one or package two QBs for a different number two quarterback Nix, Maye/Purdy/ even Baker if I got lucky, I really don't have much faith in any of the three for different reasons

JMOTED 3 months ago

Every league economy is different. I’d rather have Bryce over any QB in this class— and where is the top QB going in Rookie Drafts? I think it may take more than adding 2.01 to 1.07 to get down to 1.03, so this isn’t automatic

JMOTED 3 months ago

If you like Bryce— keep him. Otherwise, grab the dice and roll away….

trade
RogueItachi  •  26 minutes ago

12tm SF TEP A: Rome, J.McMillan, R.Davis, 27First, 27Second B: Addison, 1.10, 1.12

trade
swagno65  •  2 hours ago

SF 12 Team .25 TEP 👍🏼 McCarthy, 2026 late 2nd 🔥 1.09, 2026 late 1st

Rex09000  •  3 hours ago

In a 10 man, 1 ppr, 1 qb league. What would be a good spot to draft Brian Thomas jr? I feel like with the addition of Travis hunter his stock will drop a bit but his production will either stay the same or take a jump but idk.

JoshuaBruce  •  4 hours ago

Hampton or Hunter 1.03 Rbs: Gibbs, cook, Conner, Monty, benson Wrs: cd, puka, MHJ, JSN, Rome, Zay

misc
hasher420  •  4 hours ago

Have the 1.02 and 1.04 Who do you take in a rebuild/orphan?

trade
LacesOut1982  •  4 hours ago

Nico Collins for 2025 pick 1.07 and mid 2026 1st Yes 👍 No 🔥

trade
kingjuno33  •  4 hours ago

10 team 1 qb Mhj/Jacob's 1.2

trade
insertwhoever  •  5 hours ago

If I traded 2026 1st, 2027 1st and 2026 2nd for Patrick Mahomes… would that be a good deal since the one I attempted to trade denied my 3 picks for Mahomes or better yet didn’t want 2 future 2nd for 2.02?