12 team SF start 11 Tua for a 2026 1st + 2025 3.09
25 1st and 26 first and if they both projected 7 or later. N o. How are you going to replace Tua with a late 1st?
My entire argument is a cost/value argument. And always has been with him
yeah that happens, but counting on it?
like I understand the logic but it sounds like you'd apply the same to someone like Darnold, correct me if im wrong. been shit his entire career, but wouldnt pay his current cost or close to it even though he had a breakout yr?
Go ahead start non qb in yor sf . play your own game
12 team start 11.
The very point I am laying out is, you will need another top QB to “replace him” because he’s only going to deliver on half the games. That’s if you’re lucky enough that he’s injured and out, instead of a game where they decide to run the whole day, or he has an erratic day, or he just sucks that day, which happens more than most I see with him.
When he is out you flex?
if it is return on value then yes I understand but then I would disagree because you stated you wouldnt move a 3rd for Tua but you can easily get value on that return given how consensus views Tua, and QBs in general, in SF formats
I felt the same way about Amari Cooper his entire career. Actually up until last year when one of you pointed out that he’s been fairly consistent the last few years in Cleveland. And whoever it was, was right.
By “one of you” I mean one of you fine fellows on these boards. Don’t remember who…might have even been you @aweldon
I personally dont have him as low as QB20 at the moment but that is because there are a lot of moving pieces with the QB landscape going into offseason
No wouldnt