as a commissioner, i held a veto vote on the following trade: Josh Jacobs for Wash D, Q Johnston, and Pittman. The team getting the 3 players has not been involved in his team all year. The team getting Jacobs is now bitter that the trade was vetoed. Thoughts?

It reached 7 vetos in 5 minutes

Veto's are lame, it was a fair trade imo

So a team doesn't set line up all year. Doesn't make add drops all year. Doesn't respond other trade requests all year...but then when another team who is his brother in law comes to him and says "hey I know puca nacua has been on your bench all year, but how about I give you 2 lesser wide outs for your top RB? ...yeah there is a heavy collusion problem. Shame on me. I should have put a block on that team to avoid what the other 6 who vetoed the trade knew was coming.

Townies1 3 hours ago

These commissioners have no idea when to veto trades

Townies1 2 hours ago

I just read thread n changed my opinion

Townies1 2 hours ago

But if a guy's gonna try n cheat .

Townies1 2 hours ago

Hes not gonna say .Hey u got me

Townies1 2 hours ago

Hes gonna be defensive bout it.

Townies1 2 hours ago

Value of trade not veto worthy but situation makes it collusion n veto worthy