As the commissioner, would you allow the worst team in the league who has the Vikings DST trade them away to the #2 team in the league to receive Travis Etienne?
Or just even allowing trading away a defense for a player. Leaning towards cancelling it for the reason of not allowing a trade of a defense for a player
Every situation is different. If that player has 0 chance of making the playoffs then i would veto it
if it was switched, i'd say veto.
Then it seems like the #2 team is getting one of the best DST for someone i would never start
Yeah for sure, personally I’ll let trades go through if it’s agreed upon, but not a defense for player scenario really imo
Yeah never seen that happens seems. A bit fishy with vikings scoring so much for dst
Yeah, my leagues defense settings aren’t too crazy where they score a bunch, but they get pretty much 10+ each week, and I people are complaining about the pending trade. I’m definitely gonna veto it just for the sake of not trading a defense for a player/vice versa
Seems like a fair conclusion its hard to keep everyone happy as commish good luck👍
Etienne is bad and Vikings D is good. I think it’s a fair trade
Very fair trade
Worst team gets a long term asset
Best team gets a d that will help him win chip this year
Makes all the sense in the world
But this trade makes sense for both teams
Why I'd a player rated different than a player
Players are more valuable than Def.
But your trying to stop the team getting a def from getting better
Otherwise, I think it’s kind of a fair trade, unless they’re friends and the guy in second place is a good defense away from having a dominant team. How else would you trade for a good defense? Nobody’s gonna trade a bad defense for a good one is this a dynasty or a draft?
It’s fine dude your over thinking it , it’s just a defence
As long as he still has a chance to make playoffs
Also it doesn’t get any better then that your last place team is dishing out a defence to get a starting RB , would you rather him trade away players ? Lol
The trade is fair in isolation. I would lean no - don’t veto. Is it worth nuking the league because the #2 team got a defense? lol. I think not