Hi all, hoping to get some feedback on a recent trade in our league. A rebuilding team traded Brandon Aubrey (K) to a contending team for Malik Washington (WR). Our league wants to put it up for veto, so my question is: is this trade objectively unfair, and does it have the potential to disrupt league parity? Thank you!

This trade was also done with the intentions of reducing max PF for the team that traded away Aubrey. It makes sense in that aspect - but the haul returned is the issue IMO

BenGingrich 2 months ago

Everyone saying Aubrey is amazing values kickers way too much. He’s good, but Any kicker can do well for you given the matchup. They aren’t worth anything. Trade not unfair nor veteoable.

Clewless 2 months ago

Who the hell is Malik Washington!?!?

mcclanathan 2 months ago

It is the responsibility of the commish to talk to both team managers involved, ask why they made the trade and why they thought it is/was fair. Coming makes a decision based off what those team managers say. Other team managers in the league don’t get a vote or a say past asking the commish to look into it.

codered921 2 months ago

But who's Malik Washington though. Who cares about this trade? Lmfao

bucsbacker 2 months ago

I don't see a problem with the trade, in dynasty you're making future bets every time. As a commissioner tho your sole responsibility is to prevent collusion. That's it. If a trade is lopsided, I'd want to know who sent it. If the guy on the losing side sent it, he's gotta eat it, and if he didn't I'd give him the option to back out if they both want it the only way you can veto it is collusion. Not the commissioners job to make sure trades are even