jmanziel2 4 hours ago
leaning towards standing pat but here's prob the most intriguing offer I've gotten this season:
give: Jacobs | Pollard
get: Kelce | ACooper | Mattison
0.5ppr roster:
Hurts, Fields
(2) Jacobs, Chuba, Dobbins, Pollard, Bucky, CMC, Chubb
(2) Chase, BThomas, Flowers, Dell, Legette
Pitts
(1 flex)
here's my thought process, for it to work out in my favor prob 4-5 of these scenarios need to materialize:
-Kelce returns to high end TE1
-Cooper traded/settles as reliable WR2 (-)
-Mattison takes over and produces RB2 (may start opportunity this wkd) (-)
-CMC eventually returns to RB1
-Chubb returns to RB1 (-)
-1 of Chuba/Pollard/Bucky maintains/becomes reliable RB2 (+)
I'd individually project each of these as close to coin flip, some higher(+)/lower(-)
conversely, holding likely turns out better if at least 3 of these pan out:
-Jacobs returns to RB1/2 level
-at least 2 out of remaining RB's emerge as -weekly must starts (+)
-Thomas maintains solid WR2 or better (+)
-Pitts puts it together as mid/high end TE1
-1/2 of Flowers/Dell/Legette can fill byes at WR2 level
would rate these as slightly better than 50/50, maybe aside from Pitts but good start tonight
having to start 3wr + flx instead would give the trade more juice, but goal is optimizing highest end starting lineup for playoffs and in the end I see it mostly as just largely upgrading starting TE at the cost of having to rely on my RB lotto ticket stashes to pay off, namely CMC (who I overpaid for wk 2 in a big trade)
any thoughts