“Per @SharpFootball, 42% of Bruce Arians' 2017 #Cardinals pass plays came in 4-WR sets. NFL average was ~ 5%. If Arians brings 4-WR sets to #Bucs, candidates to benefit = Breshad Perriman, Justin Watson & Scott Miller behind Mike Evans & Chris Godwin.”

add them to john brown as well

Because the Bucs obviously don't subscribe to the "we need to see our young guys in game action" theory

Because they are irrational

He wasn't good so he didn't get on the field

Plenty of teams do that though.

if scotty was running high 4.5s then i think you have a point.

but he's running either high 4.3s or low 4.4s

however you wanna put it, thats fast

And Watson is about the same, but that's the only thing Miller has over Watson

Watson's corrects to about a 4.49 but he is better in basically every other way imaginable

It's normal to see certain vets lose snaps or get cut halfway through or near the end, then the low drafts or UDFAs come out.

If you wanted to use that argument, they would have played Jones though @TheChancellor

Jones is bad

If he's really that bad... they'd have to have wanted to see if he also sucks in game action

Because if so, they'd then want to address the position

But they didn't because they don't act rationally, so the argument does'

which is fine. but if that isn't translating on the field all his atleticism don't mean squat. i'm not here to be a scotty miller truther. i'm simply saying the argument you've made that millers size and speed mean he cant succeed in a BAs offense are false because we have 3 other examples of similarly size/statured/speed players

doesn't hold water for Watson

Miller would be the smallest and slowest of them though @jlcon07

he's not the smallest of them. he's the same size as john brown coming out of college

@DoctorLark Go Google watson and see what you can find

I'm not here to say he will 100% fail, but there are so many more positive indicators for Watson, that I wouldn't bet on it

Tied for last = last